Liberty, Games and Contracts: Jan Narveson and the Defence of Libertarianism

Join Kobo & start eReading today

Are liberty and equality compatible?

Leiden Repository

Review of Liberty, Games and Contracts: Jan Narveson and the Defence of Libertarianism, Malcolm Murray (ed.). Ashgate, Pp. Liberty, Games and Contracts: Jan Narveson & the Defence of Libertarianism [ Malcolm Murray] on www.farmersmarketmusic.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Jan.

This question is of central and continuing importance in political philosophy, moral philosophy, and welfare economics. In this book, two distinguished philosophers take up the debate.

Jan Narveson argues that a political ideal of negative liberty is incompatible with any substantive ideal of equality, while James P. Sterba argues that Narveson's own ideal of negative liberty is compatible, and in fact leads to the requirements of a substantive ideal of equality. Of course, they cannot both be right.

What is Kobo Super Points?

Thus, the details of their arguments about the political ideal of negative liberty and its requirements will determine which of them is right. Engagingly and accessibly written, their debate will be of value to all who are interested in the central issue of what are the practical requirements of a political ideal of liberty"--Provided by publisher.

The libertarian idea by Jan Narveson Book 15 editions published between and in English and held by WorldCat member libraries worldwide Libertarianism is both a philosophy and a political view. The key concepts defining Libertarianism are: Individual Rights as inherent to human beings, not granted by government; a Spontaneous Order through which people conduct their daily interactions and through which society is organized independent of central government direction; the Rule of Law which dictates that everyone is free to do as they please so long as they do not infringe upon the rights of others; a Divided and Limited Government, checked by written constitution; Free Markets in which price and exchange is agreed upon mutually by individuals; Virtue of Production whereby the productive labour of the individual and any translation of that labour into earnings belongs, by right, to the individual who should not have to sacrifice those earnings to taxes; and Peace which has, throughout history, most commonly been disrupted by the interests of the ruling class or centralized government.

Morality and utility by Jan Narveson Book 19 editions published between and in English and Italian and held by WorldCat member libraries worldwide. Moral issues Book 7 editions published in in English and Italian and held by WorldCat member libraries worldwide.

This is ethical theory by Jan Narveson Book 7 editions published between and in English and held by WorldCat member libraries worldwide "Professor Narveson distinguishes between a more general subject that may be called ethics and moral theory in particular, the main topic of this book.

Liberty , Games and Contracts - Semantic Scholar

He gives a clear and precise account of the many explanations of right and wrong recommended by philosophers, covering such points of view as utilitarianism, natural law, egoism, moral relativism, virtue ethics, and religious derivations of ethics, and also explains the metaethical theories such as intuitionism, emotivism, and prescriptivism.

For and against the state: Respecting persons in theory and practice: The essays in this collection share a consistent theme running through much of Narveson's moral and political philosophy, namely that politics and morals stem from the interests of individual people, and have no antecedent authority over us. The essays in this collection, in various ways and as applied to various aspects of the scene, argue that the ultimate and true point of politics and morals is to enable us to make our lives better, according to our varied senses of wh. But what is this theory, on which so much ink is spilled?

This collection of original essays by leading specialists in political philosophy, legal theory, and economics offers answers to that question, by exploring the theoretical commitments of liberals and some of the practical implications of their view. Among the topics explored is the distinction between liberalism and conservatism, and the degree to which liberals must be committed to neutrality, individualism, equality, freedom, and a contractarian theory of justification. In this book Malcolm Murray brings together the most significant of Narveson's critics and presents their work alongside replies by Jan Narveson.

Justice and the Politics of Difference. How to Read, Criticize and Do Theory. Foucault, Power, and Education. School and Society, 5th Edition. Why Things Matter to People. The Ethics of Care and Empathy.

About UPEI

Transforming Conflict through Insight. Good Education in an Age of Measurement. Foucault on the Politics of Parrhesia. Social Theory of International Politics. The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Making Sense of Social Theory. The Moral Foundation of Economic Behavior. The Tyranny of the Ideal. Virtues of the Family.

The Core of Care Ethics. The Morality of Gay Rights. Feminist Interpretations of John Rawls. The Subject of Liberty. Theoretical Foundations of Law and Economics.

Narveson, Jan 1936-

Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology. From Pleasure Machines to Moral Communities. Education and Human Values. Kantian Ethics and Economics.

Education, Justice and the Human Good. Coping and Conformity in World Politics. The Elements Of Social Theory. The Ethics of Giving. John Dewey and the Habits of Ethical Life.

Exploring Liberty: Libertarianism and War (Christopher A. Preble)

Justice and Public Administration. Organizational Ethics and the Good Life. Sustainability and Security within Liberal Societies. Postmodernism, Religion, and the Future of Social Work. Why Worry About Future Generations? Freedom vs Necessity in International Relations. Thinking about Higher Education. The Price of Precaution and the Ethics of Risk.

The Order of Public Reason. The Ethics of Altruism. Justice and Responsibility—Sensitive Egalitarianism.