Plagiarism and Literary Property in the Romantic Period (Material Texts)

Plagiarism and Literary Property in the Romantic Period

Plagiarism and Literary Property in the Romantic Period. April Copyright year: Prices are subject to change without notice. Prices do not include postage and handling if applicable. Free shipping for non-business customers when ordering books at De Gruyter Online.

The Romantic Period in American Literature and Art

Please find details to our shipping fees here. Print Flyer Recommend to Librarian.

Plagiarism and Literary Property in the Romantic Period (Electronic book text)

This study demonstrates that early nineteenth-century British writers consistently privileged strategies of textual appropriation even as they emphasized the value of originality. The almost exclusive association of Romanticism with self-origination is largely a belated critical invention. Moreover, although this project is informed by and sympathetic to the objectives of New Historicism and other recent scholarship deconstructing Romanticism as a disciplinary category and "self-perpetuating model," there is also at least one important respect in which this study does not participate in that critical endeavor: I have not been particularly focused on reading at the margins of Romantic-period culture and have not engaged consciously in "recovery" research, except in relation to the specific category of plagiarism.

The early nineteenth-century discourse surrounding plagiarism, however much in need of being historicized at present, was very much part of the mainstream and dominant culture of the period. In many ways it is part of the history that produced the inheritance that we designate the Romantic period. While this book considers several "non-canonical" figures and argues for their relationship to both plagiarism and more familiar literary texts of the early nineteenth century, this is essentially a study of the Romantic "canon" and of the ways in which its formation was connected to the critical debate surrounding plagiarism, influence, and the tradition.

I focus primarily on the textual appropriations of Wordsworth, Byron, and Coleridge for no other reason than that these writers were the ones who were accused of plagiarism both in the early nineteenth century and in the subsequent scholarly tradition.

  1. Plagiarism and literary property in the Romantic period - University of Missouri-Kansas City;
  2. Plagiarism and literary property in the Romantic period.
  3. Publish Your Book On Amazon: the easy way to get in print.
  4. Plagiarism and literary property in the Romantic period / Tilar J. Mazzeo - Details - Trove.
  5. Plagiarism and Literary Property in the Romantic Period - Tilar J. Mazzeo - Google Книги?
  6. Refine your editions:!

Mazzeo offers a major reassessment of the role of borrowing, textual appropriation, and narrative mastery in British Romantic literature and provides a new picture of the period Univ of Pennsylvania Press Bolero Ozon. Plagiarism and Literary Property in the Romantic Period. Property and the Margins of Literary Print Culture.

Byron Originality and Aesthetic. I have used the term historical imagination to describe what I consider to be the central methodological goal of this project, and what I mean by that term is perhaps best articulated by Charles Altieri, whose essay "Can We Be Historical Ever? Some Hopes for a Dialectical Model of Historical Self-Consciousness," engages directly the problem of historical impossibility in criticism.

In the face of our inevitable failure to view the past as the past viewed itself, Altieri proposes that we might be able toaccount for the historical process out of which one finds oneself locating the terms for one''s own historical work. This makes historical analysis the work of self-consciously taking on the burden of completing or resisting what we show we inherit.

In concrete ways, Romanticism and its ideological effects on poetry are the inheritance this study takes up, and plagiarism is one of the claims that early nineteenth-century history makes upon the present. In the course of this study, I use the terms Romanticism and Romantic deliberately, understanding that these are not neutral categories and that both words invoke a particular critical and aesthetic tradition that has privileged certain values, authors, and forms of subjectivity.

Account Options

The Cambridge Companion to Wordsworth. Poetry and the Idea of Progress, The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft. The Cambridge Companion to British Romanticism.

  • Plagiarism and literary property in the Romantic period (eBook, ) [www.farmersmarketmusic.com]!
  • Patchwork Pieces of Faith.
  • What is Kobo Super Points?.
  • Find a copy online.

Romanticism and the Rise of English. A Handbook of Romanticism Studies. The Cambridge Companion to Victorian Poetry.

Plagiarism and Literary Property in the Romantic Period

Romanticism, Sincerity and Authenticity. Romantic Autobiography in England.

Reward Yourself

Allow this favorite library to be seen by others Keep this favorite library private. Were the Romantic poets plagiarists, and did plagiarism have the same meaning two hundred years ago as it has today? Mazzeo offers a major reassessment of the role of borrowing, textual appropriation, and narrative mastery in British Romantic literature and provides a new picture of the period and its central aesthetic contests. Prices do not include postage and handling if applicable. Related articles in Google Scholar. WorldCat is the world's largest library catalog, helping you find library materials online.

William Wordsworth - The Prelude. Wordsworth and the Art of Philosophical Travel. Romanticism and the Uses of Genre. The Cambridge Companion to Coleridge. Wordsworth and the Passions of Critical Poetics.

Find a copy in the library

Victorian Poetry and Modern Life. Criticism and Literary Theory to the Present. A Companion to Romantic Poetry. British Romanticism and the Critique of Political Reason. A History of English Autobiography. Landscapes of Eternal Return. The Literature of Melancholia.