Debates in the Digital Humanities

Review of Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016

Follow the Author

The term comes from William Gibson's observation that cyberspace has turned inside out and is "flowing out into the world", that the mobility of data and its use value in the physical world is now an integral part of our reality. For instance, amongst the many other platforms that come to mind such as the British Library's Endangered Archives Project, I can think of few more illustrative cases of applied experimental work already achieved than in the media arts project at Cambridge in and , particularly as regards mapping.

Despite DH "having arrived," most of the chapters reveal a pervasive sense of anxiety and precarity. What then is DH's future promise considering the backlash from graduate students and disinterest on the part of undergrads?

Debates in the Digital Humanities

While some authors conclude that the dark side of DH is actually the bright side, Cordell, in hoping for a better engagement with the humanities concludes that DH is simply "a useful banner for gathering a community of scholars doing weird humanities work with computers" p. In that expanding context, Domenico Fiormonte in her essay "Towards a Cultural Critique of Digital Humanities" a republished version of her earlier "infamous" article given in at the "Cologne Controversies around the Digital Humanities" argues that DH practitioners should abandon the obsession with archive fever and large-scale digitalization projects.

To return to the issue of disciplinarity, Ethan Watrall's "Archaeology, the Digital Humanities and the 'Big Tent'" is particularly telling.

Watrall points out that archaeological research projects provide solid models for DH projects. However he highlights a manifest disconnect between archaeology and the digital humanities and concludes that the archaeologists "will be forever outside the 'big tent'" unless there is a "hello, nice to meet you" moment p.

Customers who bought this item also bought

Get to Know Us. Books in this Series Debates in the Digital Humanities The latest installment of a digital humanities bellwether. Skip to main content. He loves to read and this was right up his alley. The Prison-House of Data. In the opening essay Steven Jones describes how between and the network "everted" at the same time that DH achieved critical mass. For instance, did the material involve some special technical challenge — e.

Might one not logically then ask the question—Why does archaeology, especially public archaeology, need DH at all? And what then are the consequences to the future of DH considering the mantra of interdisciplinary salvation?

Account Options

Creating DH Community," I was particularly struck by the vitality of the local public history projects presented in that context and of the THAT camp phenomenon. In either event, the preponderance of the citation of digital sources in this book and those that will follow provides effective entry points into the evolving networked DH archive.

All Related News

Skip to main content. Gold and Lauren F. University of Minnesota Press, , http: Electronic work can be proposed by its author or by another person. Articles may address any aspect of global digital humanities, with these guiding principles in mind: Articles should address issues and problems not commonly faced by practitioners of DH in culturally dominant or mainstream contexts.

It is expected that most essays will deal with material in languages other than English, with a stress on non-Western languages. We would especially welcome essays on situations where not only the data but also the user interface employs a non-English language, especially a non-Western language. While many papers will no doubt foreground specific projects, the focus should not be on reporting or describing a project but on some wider issue, problem or principle involved, and should answer a question or present an argument about that subject.

For instance, did the material involve some special technical challenge — e. Were there special problems of access to the material, or social challenges or resistance? How were these problems resolved or not , and what lessons or benefits to future ventures were learned? Such technical and academic issues might lead to broader issues of cultural politics. But these broader questions should emerge from the discussion of DH projects or problems. Issues of cultural politics will be organic to all material in the volume. But such issues should emerge from DH projects or problems discussed.

Topics may include, but are not limited to, the following: Articles should not exceed 5, words. Diagrams or illustrations may occupy additional pages of average print size.

  • Lo sai che i papaveri (Italian Edition)?
  • O Federalismo em Portugal: Uma reforma democrática (Portuguese Edition).
  • Debates in the Digital Humanities: Matthew K. Gold: www.farmersmarketmusic.com: Books.
  • Understanding Solvency II, What is different after October 2013!
  • Review of Debates in the Digital Humanities | Leonardo.
  • Pressure: First Encounter.

Extra diagrams may be adjusted against a shorter text. More space will be considered only in exceptional cases. The printed book will be in English.

JISC - Roundtable Debate: [8 of 8] Electronic technologies in the Arts & Humanities and

There will also be a digital version, located at http: The editors can review original versions in Spanish, Italian or French; they may attempt to find reviewers in other languages, but cannot undertake to do so. Articles in all languages other than English should be submitted with an English translation.