Contents:
Assisted suicide is illegal in Denmark. Passive euthanasia, or the refusal to accept treatment, is not illegal. Assisted suicide is not legal in France. The controversy over legalising euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is not as big as in the United States because of the country's "well developed hospice care programme". After a car crash that left him "unable to 'walk, see, speak, smell or taste'", he used the movement of his right thumb to write a book, I Ask the Right to Die Je vous demande le droit de mourir in which he voiced his desire to "die legally".
Though his mother was arrested for aiding in her son's death and later acquitted, the case did jump-start new legislation which states that when medicine serves "no other purpose than the artificial support of life" it can be "suspended or not undertaken". Killing somebody in accordance with their demands is always illegal under the German criminal code Paragraph , "Killing at the request of the victim; mercy killing". Assisting suicide by, for example, providing poison or a weapon, is generally legal.
Since suicide itself is legal, assistance or encouragement is not punishable by the usual legal mechanisms dealing with complicity and incitement German criminal law follows the idea of "accessories of complicity" which states that "the motives of a person who incites another person to commit suicide, or who assists in its commission, are irrelevant". There can however be legal repercussions under certain conditions for a number of reasons.
Aside from laws regulating firearms, the trade and handling of controlled substances and the like e. Action out of free will is not ruled out by the decision to end one's life in itself; it can be assumed as long as a suicidal person "decides on his own fate up to the end [ Free will cannot be assumed, however, if someone is manipulated or deceived. A classic textbook example for this, in German law, is the so-called Sirius case on which the Federal Court of Justice ruled in The accused had convinced an acquaintance that she would be reincarnated into a better life if she killed herself.
She unsuccessfully attempted suicide, leading the accused to be charged with, and eventually convicted of attempted murder. Apart from manipulation, the criminal code states three conditions under which a person is not acting under his own free will:. Under these circumstances, even if colloquially speaking one might say a person is acting of his own free will, a conviction of murder is possible.
Under this rule, the party assisting in the suicide can be convicted if, in finding the suicidal person in a state of unconsciousness , they do not do everything in their power to revive the subject. This reasoning is disputed by legal scholars, citing that a life-threatening condition that is part, so to speak, of a suicide underway, is not an emergency.
For those who would rely on that defence, the Federal Court of Justice has considered it an emergency in the past. German law puts certain people in the position of a warrantor Garantenstellung for the well-being of another, e. Such people might find themselves legally bound to do what they can to prevent a suicide; if they do not, they are guilty of homicide by omission. Assisted suicide is illegal. The discussion on euthanasia has never received any interest in Iceland, and both lay people and health care professionals seem to have little interest in the topic.
A few articles have appeared in newspapers but gained little attention.
Depending on the circumstances, euthanasia is regarded as either manslaughter or murder and is punishable by up to life imprisonment. In March , a vote to legalise assisted suicide was lost by a single vote at the time, assisted suicide was not illegal, as suicide was permitted under the criminal code, but a person assisting someone to take their own life could face prosecution. Netherlands is the first country in the world formally to legalise euthanasia. Physician-assisted suicide became allowed under the Act of which states the specific procedures and requirements needed in order to provide such assistance.
Assisted suicide in the Netherlands follows a medical model which means that only doctors of patients who are suffering "unbearably without hope" [] are allowed to grant a request for an assisted suicide. The Netherlands allows people over the age of 12 to pursue an assisted suicide when deemed necessary. Assisted suicide is illegal in New Zealand. Under Section of the Crimes Act , it is illegal to 'aid and abet suicide.
South Africa is struggling with the debate over legalizing euthanasia. Owing to the underdeveloped health care system that pervades the majority of the country, Willem Landman, "a member of the South African Law Commission, at a symposium on euthanasia at the World Congress of Family Doctors" stated that many South African doctors would be willing to perform acts of euthanasia when it became legalized in the country. On 30 April the High Court in Pretoria granted Advocate Robin Stransham-Ford an order that would allow a doctor to assist him in taking his own life without the threat of prosecution.
Though it is illegal to assist a patient in dying in some circumstances, there are others where there is no offence committed. A person brought to court on a charge could presumably avoid conviction by proving that they were "motivated by the good intentions of bringing about a requested death for the purposes of relieving " suffering " rather than for "selfish" reasons. The person helping also has to avoid actually doing the act that leads to death, lest they be convicted under Article For instance, it should be the suicide subject who actually presses the syringe or takes the pill, after the helper had prepared the setup.
Sir Edward was not terminally ill, but his wife was diagnosed with rapidly developing cancer. In May , Zurich held a referendum that asked voters whether i assisted suicide should be prohibited outright; and ii whether Dignitas and other assisted suicide providers should not admit overseas users. Zurich voters heavily rejected both bans, despite anti-euthanasia lobbying from two Swiss social conservative political parties, the Evangelical People's Party of Switzerland and Federal Democratic Union. In June , The BBC televised the assisted suicide of Peter Smedley, a canning factory owner, who was suffering from motor neurone disease.
The programme — Sir Terry Pratchett's Choosing To Die — told the story of Peter's journey to the end where he used The Dignitas Clinic, a euthanasia clinic in Switzerland, to assist him in carrying out the taking of his own life. The programme shows Peter eating chocolates to counter the unpalatable taste of the liquid he drinks to end his own life. Moments after drinking the liquid, Peter begged for water, gasped for breath and became red, he then fell into a deep sleep where he snored heavily while holding his wife's hand.
Minutes later, Peter stopped breathing and his heart stopped beating. In Switzerland non-physician-assisted suicide is legal, the assistance mostly being provided by volunteers, whereas in Belgium and the Netherlands, a physician must be present.
In Switzerland, the doctors are primarily there to assess the patient's decision capacity and prescribe the lethal drugs. Additionally, unlike cases in the United States, a person is not required to have a terminal illness but only the capacity to make decisions. Assisted suicide, while criminal, does not appear to have caused any convictions, as article 37 of the Penal Code effective states: Deliberately assisting a suicide is illegal. During its passage peers voted down two amendments which were proposed by opponents of the Bill.
Should we focus on the small number of patients who outlive the average, or those who follow the usual course? Developing A Treatment Plan Given the bewildering array of medical technology, patients look to their physicians for guidance. Sir Edward was not terminally ill, but his wife was diagnosed with rapidly developing cancer. Preventability Is in the Eye of the Reviewer". The World Federation of Right to Die Societies was founded in and encompasses 38 right-to-die organizations in 23 different countries. The researchers believe that this makes total sense, considering that by seeing the same specialist repeatedly, the patient has the opportunity to build up a relationship of trust that benefits both parties. All patients who participated in the study were determined in advance to be mentally competent.
The Second Reading was the first time the House was able to vote on the issue since Unlike the other jurisdictions in the United Kingdom, suicide was not illegal in Scotland before and still is not thus no associated offences were created in imitation. Depending on the actual nature of any assistance given to a suicide, the offences of murder or culpable homicide might be committed or there might be no offence at all; the nearest modern prosecutions bearing comparison might be those where a culpable homicide conviction has been obtained when drug addicts have died unintentionally after being given "hands on" non-medical assistance with an injection.
Modern law regarding the assistance of someone who intends to die has a lack of certainty as well as a lack of relevant case law; this has led to attempts to introduce statutes providing more certainty. The Catholic Church and the Church of Scotland , the largest denomination in Scotland, opposed the bill. The bill was rejected by a vote of 85—16 with 2 abstentions in December The Bill entered the main committee scrutiny stage in January and reached a vote in Parliament several months later; however the bill was again rejected.
In Montana through the trial court ruling Baxter v. Montana , the court found no public policy against assisting suicide, so consent may be raised as a defense at trial. Oregon and Washington specify some restrictions. It was briefly legal in New Mexico from , but this verdict was overturned in Oregon requires a physician to prescribe drugs but, it must be self-administered. For the patient to be eligible, the patient must be diagnosed by an attending physician as well as by a consulting physician, with a terminal illness that will cause the death of the individual within six months.
The law states that, in order to participate, a patient must be: It is up to the attending physician to determine whether these criteria have been met. The physician must notify the patient of alternatives; such as palliative care, hospice and pain management. Lastly the physician is to request but not require the patient to notify their next of kin that they are requesting a prescription for a lethal dose of medication.
Assuming all guidelines are met and the patient is deemed competent and completely sure they wish to end their life, the physician will prescribe the drugs. The law was passed in Washington's rules and restrictions are similar, if not exactly the same, as Oregon's. Not only does the patient have to meet the above criteria, they also have to be examined by not one, but two doctors licensed in their state of residence.
Both doctors must come to the same conclusion about the patient's prognosis. If one doctor does not see the patient fit for the prescription, then the patient must undergo psychological inspection to tell whether or not the patient is in fact capable and mentally fit to make the decision of assisted death or not. In May , Vermont became the fourth state in the union to legalize medical aid-in-dying.
This bill states that the qualifying patient must be at least 18, a Vermont resident and suffering from an incurable and irreversible disease, with less than six months to live. Also, two physicians, including the prescribing doctor must make the medical determination.
In January , it seemed as though New Mexico had inched closer to being the fifth state in the United States to legalize assisted suicide via a court ruling. Nash of the Second District Court in Albuquerque. The NM attorney general's office said it was studying the decision and whether to appeal to the State Supreme Court. The Court gave the verdict: This made it the third state to legalize medical aid-in-dying by a vote of the people, raising the total to six states.
The punishment for participating in physician-assisted death PAD varies throughout many states. States currently considering assisted suicide laws [ citation needed ]. In Washington, physician-assisted suicide did not become legal until This lawsuit was first part of a district court hearing, where it ruled in favor of Glucksberg, [] which was the group of physicians and terminally ill patients. The lawsuit was then affirmed by the Ninth Circuit. Eventually, the Supreme Court decided, with a unanimous vote, that medical aid in dying was not a protected right under the constitution as of the time of this case.
A highly publicized case in the United States was the death of Brittany Maynard in After being diagnosed with terminal brain cancer , Maynard decided that instead of suffering with the side effects the cancer would bring, she wanted to choose when she would die. She was residing in California when she was diagnosed, where assisted death was not legal. She and her husband moved to Oregon where assisted death was legal, so she could take advantage of the program. Before her death, she started the Brittany Maynard fund, which works to legalize the choice of ending one's life in cases of a terminal illness.
Her public advocacy motivated her family to continue to try and get assisted death laws passed in all 50 states. These studies, conducted in the Netherlands in , , and totaling cases of which cases were physician-assisted suicide and were euthanasia, showed complications of any category were of higher frequency in cases of assisted suicide than in cases of euthanasia. All patients who participated in the study were determined in advance to be mentally competent.
The authors conclude that the " From to a group of doctors in the Netherlands interviewed and studied physicians in charge of giving patients the life ending drugs used in assisted suicide cases.
They found that from to the use of this method rose slightly as more patients were turning to assisted suicide as an end of life option. From to the number of deaths from assisted suicide methods had risen from in to in They also discovered there was a number of physicians equal to about 0. More research can be found on the website of Living and Dying Well UK, an organization which researches and analyzes evidence surrounding end-of-life issues. In the American television series House , assisted suicide is mentioned multiple times.
The character Allison Cameron assisted in the death of a patient in the episode Informed Consent after its revealed he has a terminal condition. In the episode Known Unknowns , Dr. Wilson , an oncologist , reveals he indirectly provided a patient dying from cancer the code to increase his morphine level to a lethal amount leading to the patients death.
In the episode The Dig , Thirteen reveals she assisted her brother in his suicide who was suffering from advanced symptoms of Huntington's disease and that was she was sent to prison for overprescribing. In the same episode, House promises to assist her in killing herself once her own Huntington's symptoms get too bad. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Assessment of risk Crisis hotline list Intervention Prevention Suicide watch.
Asphyxiation Hanging Train Cop Seppuku. List of suicides Suicide in antiquity List of suicides in the 21st century. Banzai charge Kamikaze Suicide attack Suicide mission. Euthanasia and the slippery slope. Euthanasia in the Netherlands. Euthanasia in New Zealand.
Assisted suicide in the United Kingdom. Assisted suicide in the United States. Legal under court ruling 1. Archived from the original on Archived from the original PDF on December 19, Retrieved 23 October Retrieved 4 October The New England Journal of Medicine. Journal of Palliative Medicine. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. Retrieved May 2nd, Check date values in: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.
Disabled Activists for Dignity in Dying. Retrieved 14 August The arts and science of rational suicide in the face of unbearable, unrelievable suffering: The EXIT euthanasia blog. The New York Times. Retrieved 4 August The Law and Professional Ethics". Retrieved 15 November Vulnerable populations, prejudice, and physician-assisted death". Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality. Administering the Church — Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Retrieved 13 December Lawmakers Revisit Assisted Suicide Issue". Problems of bioethics - The Russian Orthodox Church". United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Retrieved March 10, Retrieved 16 October Retrieved 17 October New England Journal of Medicine. A medical error is a preventable adverse effect of care, whether or not it is evident or harmful to the patient.
This might include an inaccurate or incomplete diagnosis or treatment of a disease , injury , syndrome , behavior , infection , or other ailment. Globally, it is estimated that , people died in from adverse effects of medical treatment; this is an increase from 94, in The word error in medicine is used as a label for nearly all of the clinical incidents that harm patients. Medical errors are often described as human errors in healthcare. It has been said that the definition should be the subject of more debate.
At the least, they are negligence, if not dereliction, but in medicine they are lumped together under the word error with innocent accidents and treated as such. There are many types of medical error, from minor to major, [6] and causality is often poorly determined.
There are many taxonomies for classifying medical errors. Globally, it is estimated that , people died in from adverse effects of medical treatment; in , the number was 94, A Institute of Medicine report estimated that medical errors result in between 44, and 98, preventable deaths and 1,, excess injuries each year in U. A follow-up to the IOM study found that medication errors are among the most common medical mistakes, harming at least 1.
According to the study, , preventable drug-related injuries occur each year in hospitals, , in long-term care settings, and roughly , among Medicare recipients in outpatient clinics. The report stated that these are likely to be conservative estimates. None of these figures take into account lost wages and productivity or other costs. According to a Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality report, about 7, people were estimated to die each year from medication errors — about 16 percent more deaths than the number attributable to work-related injuries 6, deaths. One extrapolation suggests that , people die each year partly as a result of iatrogenic injury.
The World Health Organization registered 14 million new cases and 8. As the number of cancer patients receiving treatment increases, hospitals around the world are seeking ways to improve patient safety, to emphasize traceability and raise efficiency in their cancer treatment processes. A study released in found medical error is the third leading cause of death in the United States, after heart disease and cancer.
Researchers looked at studies that analyzed the medical death rate data from to and extrapolated that over , deaths per year had stemmed from a medical error, which translates to 9. However, the mistake would be recorded in the third type of study. If a doctor recommends an unnecessary treatment or test, it may not show in any of these types of studies. Medical errors are associated with inexperienced physicians and nurses, new procedures, extremes of age, and complex or urgent care.
Falls, for example, may result from patients' own misjudgements. Human error has been implicated in nearly 80 percent of adverse events that occur in complex healthcare systems. The vast majority of medical errors result from faulty systems and poorly designed processes versus poor practices or incompetent practitioners. Complicated technologies, powerful drugs, intensive care, and prolonged hospital stay can contribute to medical errors. In , The Institute of Medicine released " To Err is Human ," which asserted that the problem in medical errors is not bad people in health care—it is that good people are working in bad systems that need to be made safer.
Poor communication and unclear lines of authority of physicians, nurses, and other care providers are also contributing factors. Other factors include the impression that action is being taken by other groups within the institution, reliance on automated systems to prevent error. The American Institute of Architects has identified concerns for the safe design and construction of health care facilities. As a result, diagnostic procedures or treatments cannot be performed, leading to substandard treatment.
The Joint Commission 's Annual Report on Quality and Safety found that inadequate communication between healthcare providers, or between providers and the patient and family members, was the root cause of over half the serious adverse events in accredited hospitals. Cognitive errors commonly encountered in medicine were initially identified by psychologists Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman in the early s. Jerome Groopman , author of How Doctors Think , says these are "cognitive pitfalls", biases which cloud our logic.
For example, a practitioner may overvalue the first data encountered, skewing his thinking or recent or dramatic cases which come quickly to mind and may color judgement. Another pitfall is where stereotypes may prejudice thinking. Sleep deprivation has also been cited as a contributing factor in medical errors. Practitioner risk factors include fatigue, [43] [44] [45] depression, and burnout. Errors can include misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis, administration of the wrong drug to the wrong patient or in the wrong way, giving multiple drugs that interact negatively, surgery on an incorrect site, failure to remove all surgical instruments , failure to take the correct blood type into account, or incorrect record-keeping.
A 10th type of error is ones which are not watched for by researchers, such as RNs failing to program an IV pump to give a full dose of IV antibiotics or other medication. A large study reported several cases where patients were wrongly told that they were HIV-negative when the physicians erroneously ordered and interpreted HTLV a closely related virus testing rather than HIV testing.
Female sexual desire sometimes used to be diagnosed as female hysteria. Sensitivities to foods and food allergies risk being misdiagnosed as the anxiety disorder Orthorexia. Studies have found that bipolar disorder has often been misdiagnosed as major depression. Its early diagnosis necessitates that clinicians pay attention to the features of the patient's depression and also look for present or prior hypomanic or manic symptomatology.
The misdiagnosis of schizophrenia is also a common problem. There may be long delays of patients getting a correct diagnosis of this disorder.
The DSM-5 field trials included "test-retest reliability" which involved different clinicians doing independent evaluations of the same patient—a new approach to the study of diagnostic reliability. Misdiagnosis is the leading cause of medical error in outpatient facilities. Mistakes can have a strongly negative emotional impact on the doctors who commit them. Some physicians recognize that adverse outcomes from errors usually do not happen because of an isolated error and actually reflect system problems.
Therefore, even if a doctor or nurse makes a small error e. There may be several breakdowns in processes to allow one adverse outcome. Essayists imply that the potential to make mistakes is part of what makes being a physician rewarding and without this potential the rewards of medical practice would be diminished. Laurence states that "Everybody dies, you and all of your patients.
Would you want it any other way? On a daily basis, it is both a privilege and a joy to have the trust of patients and their families and the camaraderie of peers. There is no challenge to make your blood race like that of a difficult case, no mind game as rigorous as the challenging differential diagnosis, and though the stakes are high, so are the rewards.
Forgiveness , which is part of many cultural traditions, may be important in coping with medical mistakes. Inability to forgive oneself may create a cycle of distress and increased likelihood of a future error. However, Wu et al. A study by Wendy Levinson of the University of Toronto showed surgeons discussing medical errors used the word "error" or "mistake" in only 57 percent of disclosure conversations and offered a verbal apology only 47 percent of the time. Patient disclosure is important in the medical error process. The current standard of practice at many hospitals is to disclose errors to patients when they occur.
In the past, it was a common fear that disclosure to the patient would incite a malpractice lawsuit. Many physicians would not explain that an error had taken place, causing a lack of trust toward the healthcare community. However, "there appears to be a gap between physicians' attitudes and practices regarding error disclosure. Willingness to disclose errors was associated with higher training level and a variety of patient-centered attitudes, and it was not lessened by previous exposure to malpractice litigation". Consequently, in the United States , many states have enacted laws excluding expressions of sympathy after accidents as proof of liability.
However, "excluding from admissibility in court proceedings apologetic expressions of sympathy but not fault-admitting apologies after accidents" [80]. Disclosure may actually reduce malpractice payments. In a study of physicians who reported having made a mistake, it was offered that disclosing to non-physician sources of support may reduce stress more than disclosing to physician colleagues. It is possible that greater benefit occurs when spouses are physicians. Discussing mistakes with other physicians is beneficial. Disclosure of errors, especially 'near misses' may be able to reduce subsequent errors in institutions that are capable of reviewing near misses.
Based on anecdotal and survey evidence, Banja [87] states that rationalization making excuses is very common among the medical profession to cover up medical errors. A survey of more than 10, physicians in the United States came to the results that, on the question "Are there times when it's acceptable to cover up or avoid revealing a mistake if that mistake would not cause harm to the patient?
On the question "Are there times when it is acceptable to cover up or avoid revealing a mistake if that mistake would potentially or likely harm the patient? Traditionally, errors are attributed to mistakes made by individuals who may be penalized for these mistakes. The usual approach to correct the errors is to create new rules with additional checking steps in the system, aiming to prevent further errors.
As an example, an error of free flow IV administration of heparin is approached by teaching staff how to use the IV systems and to use special care in setting the IV pump. While overall errors become less likely, the checks add to workload and may in themselves be a cause of additional errors. A newer model for improvement in medical care takes its origin from the work of W. Edwards Deming in a model of Total Quality Management. In this model, there is an attempt to identify the underlying system defect that allowed the opportunity for the error to occur.
As an example, in such a system the error of free flow IV administration of Heparin is dealt with by not using IV heparin and substituting subcutaneous administration of heparin, obviating the entire problem.