Mutter des Monats: Roman (German Edition)

Ursula Dubosarsky

---

Conrad Beissel , mystic and founder of the Ephrata Cloister in , was an amazing personality.

Meaning of "Hauptspeise" in the German dictionary

Although uneducated, and by trade a baker, and later a weaver, Beissel authored many mystically-themed books that influenced not only the Cloister celibates, but many outside well-schooled minds as well. He spiritually inspired those around him to excel in their illustrations of the music books that contained both traditional, as well as original music created by Beissel and other members.

In fact, Mann commented that the spirit of Beissel was present throughout the entire work. This is one of two surviving paginated copies of a very important set of manuscript letters authored by Conrad Beissel. The other set Ac. With the exception of a fragment of a letter to Ezechiel Sangmeister in the Borneman collection, both contain the same letters.

Most of them are theosophical missives directed to persons named in the salutations, as well as philosophical and religious thoughts penned to no one in particular. Gathering signatures are noted on the Borneman Ms 22 leaves as if the Ms were intended for publication. The Pennsylvania State University Press, , vol. Brethren Publishing House, , Letter Book of Conrad Beissel: Cassel collection, Record Nr. Retrieved 18 June from http: The resulting scandal took down both Bell Pottinger and Zuma.

In , the Azerbaijani government sentenced 25 journalists and activists to lengthy prison terms following politically-motivated show trials. Torture of prisoners is common, as is harassment of suspected LGBT individuals. It seems that wherever Tony Blair goes, Wales follows. Wikipedia relies on consensus, not ultimate Truth — the more sources support a particular view, the more likely that view will prevail.

A Harvard Business School study purported to show that opposing political factions moved toward the center over time in a consensus model, but they assumed a level playing field that simply does not exist in Wikipedia. The Croatian language Wikipedia exemplifies one danger of a consensus-focused model.

Their crimes have all but disappeared from Croatian Wikipedia, and other articles have also been changed to reflect a strong bias against Serbs and LGBT people. Ultimately, politically-motivated historical revisionism is no different than scientific Skepticism, except one is considered permissible in polite company. Null is a board-certified clinical nutritionist who has conducted over 40 clinical studies on lifestyle and diet, more than anyone else in his field.

He hosts the longest-running daily non-commercial radio program in history and for 12 years ran the most popular show on WABC. He has published over articles, many in peer-reviewed journals, and has been invited to present his findings at scientific conferences. His research showed humans could not only survive but thrive on a diet wholly devoid of animal protein.

He has counseled tens of thousands of people over his year career, never charging a penny. None of these achievements are in his Wikipedia bio, which focuses instead on his divergence from medical orthodoxy and accuses him of quackery. For that reason, self-published media, such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs as distinguished from newsblogs, above , content farms, Internet forum postings, and social media postings, are largely not acceptable as sources. Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer.

They stonewall attempts to delete his page and block editors who make repeated efforts to remove the defamatory material. Attempts to take the matter to higher authorities are persistently rebuffed. After Null and his lawyers gave up on correcting individual facts within the article, they nominated it for deletion. They reasoned that surely a person who was dismissed as a quack by so many editors should not be deemed worthy of a page in the first place.

Publication details

There was an extended discussion among Wikipedia editors on how to treat Quackwatch as a source. Skepticism appears to be official policy at Wikipedia.

Synonyms and antonyms of Hauptspeise in the German dictionary of synonyms

He simply does not have the scientific literature on his side, and cannot be considered a reliable source just because he is quoted as an expert in outside publications. By that logic, New York Times reporter Judith Miller would be considered a reliable source on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. I reviewed the scientific literature on five topics where Null and Barrett disagree — sugar, alcohol, mercury, fluoridation, and the safety of vitamins and minerals — and after scanning thousands of abstracts, found Barrett to be wrong on every issue.

We all make mistakes, but when one is so arrogant they cannot acknowledge their error and instead insist on repeating it, there must be consequences. Wikipedia has insulated itself from legal action using section of the Communications Decency Act, which holds that as a neutral content platform it is not responsible for what is written by editors on the site. However, by selectively applying its rules, it takes on editorial functions and exits that legal sanctuary.

Wikipedia must answer for its malicious actions, for all the lies it has perpetuated and truths it has covered up. Because it cloaks itself in the non-profit structure of the Wikimedia Foundation, its day of reckoning must include an investigative review and audit by the Internal Revenue Service.

Wikipedia: Rotten to the Core

They stand behind their positions and are open and available for debate and discussion. Because Wikipedia editors are anonymous, their backgrounds remain unknown, their biases hidden. There is no way to tell whether an editor is an expert or a malicious actor. In , a prolific Wikipedia editor who claimed to be a graduate professor with degrees in theology and canon law was revealed to be a year-old college dropout. Wikipedia acts as Grand Inquisitor, presiding over online show trials in which the victims are prohibited from defending themselves and forced to watch as their names are dragged through the mud.

Wikipedia may have begun life as an open-source utopia of free knowledge, but it has devolved into a repressive oligarchy run by unaccountable petty tyrants. It is a punitive system that targets those who refuse to toe the line.

Anyone who represents a threat to the establishment can become a victim, and once an ideologically-motivated cabal of editors sinks its teeth into your article, there is no way to remove them. Because of space restrictions, I have reserved some material for future articles, including revelations from whistleblowers and independent legal expertise outlining how Wikipedia can be challenged in the courts.

Translation of «Hauptspeise» into 25 languages

Once the first lawsuit is won, there will be a torrent of legal action as all those who have been victimized by Wikipedia step forward to claim their pound of flesh. I believe that Jimmy Wales knows he is not what he pretends to be — that for all his famous friends, for all the fawning media profiles he commissions, he lives in terror that someday someone will pull back the curtain and expose him.

I believe it is this fear and insecurity that leads him to overreact to the slightest criticism with such disproportionate vitriol, only opening his mouth in order to more deeply wedge his foot in it. Wales seems terrified he — and his site — will soon be exposed as shallow, hollow, biased impostors, with no more authenticity than a Hollywood set. Like others who, thinking themselves omnipotent, have abused their positions of power — the Harvey Weinsteins, Robert Dursts, Dennis Hasterts, and Bernie Madoffs of the world — Wales will fall victim to his own hubris.

Until we are shown incontrovertible proof that a respected authority is lying to us, we cling to that authority tenaciously, lest our worldview begin to crumble.

Why the Italian President’s Decision was Legitimate

Once the world knows the truth about Wales and Wikipedia, they will wonder how they ever trusted this organization to serve as an encyclopedia, fact-checker, judge, jury and executioner. Gazing upon the ruins of one of the greatest frauds of the 21st century, they will be forced to wonder who else is lying to them.

Therefore, it will not be the mainstream media who exposes the truth, for they are too invested in the status quo. Only brave independent journalists will have the integrity to expose this deception and bring the fraudulent edifice of Jimmy Wales crashing down once and for all. This is only the beginning of a multi-part investigation.

Stronger revelations are forthcoming. Statement by Jimbo Wales.

Paid PR scandal erupts at Wikipedia. Outgoing chief warns of potential corruption. Retrieved 23 Aug Accessed 23 Aug A look at a Wikipedia editor's long-running campaign to discredit anti-war campaigners and journalists. The Dictator and I.

• To Be Men (Ultra Gay XXX)
• The Evolution Gene (The Evolution Gene Series Book 1)
• Natural Facelift: Easy Slanting - Relieve Stress in 5 Minutes a Day! Anti-Aging Body Lift, Lose Belly Fat, Improve Complexion, Memory, Energy, Eyesight, Posture, Totally Rejuvenate
• The San Francisco Trilogy
• Le Voyage de Monsieur Perrichon (French Edition)